【芝士面包棒】
by 毛毛妈
我用法式牛角面包的面团做了这个芝士面包棒，表皮真是又酥又松，里面很柔软，太好吃了。
1：温水1杯+3大匙（共285克），白糖1茶匙（4克），快速发酵粉（fast rising yeast）1.5茶匙；
2：中筋面粉2.5杯（400克），盐1茶匙，拌匀；
3：玉米油1大匙；
4：牛油3/4杯+1大匙（185克）切成薄片，室温下放置30分钟；
芝士馅：
5：Parmesan 芝士粉1/2杯，2大匙干香菜末（dried parsley）；
蛋液：
6：鸡蛋一个，加水1.5大匙打散均匀。
以上材料做16个芝士面包棒
注：1大匙Tablespoon=15毫升，1茶匙Teaspoon=5毫升，1杯Cup=240毫升。
做法：
1、先将所有1料放入容器中搅拌均匀（图1左），再静置10分钟。中号盆内放入所有2料（图1右），将1大匙玉米油拌入1料的酵母水，然后倒入中号面盆里揉成软面团（图2），盖上保鲜膜放温暖地方发酵。
2、等面团发到两倍大以后（图3），放入冰箱冷藏20分钟。拿出面团稍揉成长圆条，压扁后擀开，成15×40厘米的长方形（图4），将牛油薄片平铺在左边2/3的面积。将右边没有牛油的1/3向左叠（图5），再将有牛油的左端1/3向右叠（图6）。旋转90度后，擀开成30×60厘米的长方形（图7），再从两端往中间叠成三褶（图8），用保鲜膜包好，放冰箱里冷藏15分钟。
4、重覆步骤3两次。然后将面团擀开成30×60厘米的长方形，用刀一横一竖切为4等份（图9）。每份刷上蛋液（图9），将芝士粉和干香菜末放一小盆里混合均匀（图10），撒在其中2块饼皮上（图11），将另外2片分别盖在上面（图12），稍压压紧。
6、取出面包棒刷上蛋液，盖上保鲜膜，室温静置45-75分钟左右，至体积胀大1倍（图16）。烤箱预热至375F/190摄氏度，温度达到后再等3分钟，将烤盘烤箱里烤12-14分钟左右，至表面金黄即可。
In this awesome scheme of things you’ll secure a B+ for effort and hard work. Where you confused me ended up being on the specifics. You know, they say, the devil is in the details… And that couldn’t be much more true right here. Having said that, let me inform you what did work. The article (parts of it) can be really persuasive and this is most likely the reason why I am taking the effort to opine. I do not really make it a regular habit of doing that. Second, although I can see a jumps in logic you make, I am not necessarily convinced of exactly how you appear to unite the ideas that help to make the conclusion. For now I will subscribe to your point however trust in the near future you connect your dots much better.
Greetings from Los angeles! I’m bored to death at work so I decided to browse your website on my iphone during lunch break. I love the info you provide here and can’t wait to take a look when I get home. I’m shocked at how quick your blog loaded on my cell phone .. I’m not even using WIFI, just 3G .. Anyways, wonderful blog!
I was looking through some of your articles on this website and I think this web site is really instructive! Retain putting up.
Thank you, I’ve just been looking for information about this topic for a long time and yours is the greatest I have came upon so far. However, what in regards to the bottom line? Are you positive about the source?